| Title | Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2022 |
| Authors | Watson KS, Cohn EG, Fair A, Menon U, Szalacha LA, Carpenter SM, Wilkins CH |
| Journal | Health ExpectationsHealth Expectations |
| Volume | 25 |
| Pagination | 1478-1485 |
| Type of Article | Article |
| ISBN Number | 13696513 |
| Accession Number | 158201128 |
| Keywords | conceptual framework, CONCEPTUAL structures, Cultural Pluralism, DISCRIMINATION (Sociology), Diversity in clinical trials, GENOMICS, Health Services Accessibility, HUMAN research subjects, Human services programs, INDIVIDUALIZED medicine, INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, Medical ethics, Medical Research, Patient Participation, Patient selection, Precision Medicine, PRIVACY, RESEARCH funding, Social justice, Social Stigma, STAKEHOLDER analysis, stakeholder engagement, Trust |
| Abstract | Introduction: Genomic/precision medicine offers a remarkable opportunity to improve health and address health disparities. Genomic medicine is the study of genes and their interaction with health. Precision medicine is an approach to disease prevention and treatment that considers individual variability in genes, environment and lifestyle. Conclusions from studies lacking diversity may hinder generalizability as genomic variation occurs within and between populations. Historical factors, such as medical mistrust, ethical issues related to decision making, and data sharing pose complex challenges that may further widen inequities in genomic/precision medicine if not appropriately addressed. Although few biomedical studies integrate priorities of community partners into their conceptual framework, effective implementation of genomic/precision medicine research calls for the involvement of diverse stakeholders to expand traditional unidirectional models of engagement in clinical research towards authentic bidirectional collaboration. Methods: A multipronged approach was used integrating an evidence‐based literature review and best practices in developing and evaluating the engagement of diverse stakeholders in genomic and precision medicine research. This was combined with expert consensus building to adapt a conceptual model from a community engagement framework to addressing genomics to be scalable to engagement science, which is challenging to genomic/precision medicine research. Results: The final enhanced conceptual framework is composed of four overarching dimensions now inclusive of domains in trust, exploitation, discrimination, privacy risk, stigmatization, prior harms/injustices, failure to recognize coexisting governments, intersectionality and research transformation. This conceptual framework proposes effective participant research engagement strategies for upstream relationship building, distinct from downstream recruitment strategies in which the goal is enrolment. Conclusion: To further shape the evolution of genomic/precision medicine research, it is important to leverage existing partnerships, engage participants beyond recruitment and embrace diverse perspectives. Patient or Public Contribution: In preparation of this manuscript, the perspectives of the community partners on the impact of engaging in genomic/precision medicine research beyond research participation were integrated into this conceptual framework from various guided listening sessions held in diverse communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Health Expectations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
Topics:
